Skip to main content
Powermark header

Patient-reported health-related quality of life with KISQALI + ET and ET alone in HR+/HER2- mBC

Time to deterioration (TTD) ≥10% across the MONALEESA trials1-3
Table showing median TTD ≥10% in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials.

HRQOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire—a validated tool used worldwide to assess quality of life in patients with cancer.1-3,8,9

  • HRQOL was a secondary end point measured by patient-reported outcomes and was assessed at baseline and every 8 to 12 weeks throughout treatment

  • TTD was defined as a decline of at least 10% of the global health status/QOL scale score or death due to any cause

  • There was no prespecified statistical procedure controlling for type 1 error

  • The EORTC QLQ-C30 is not all inclusive and does not include adequate assessment of all expected treatment-related symptoms. TTD may be confounded by events not related to disease/treatment

MONALEESA-2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of KISQALI + letrozole (n=334) vs placebo + letrozole (n=334) in postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who received no prior therapy for advanced disease. OS was a secondary end point; PFS was the primary end point.10-12

MONALEESA-3 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of KISQALI + fulvestrant (n=484) vs placebo + fulvestrant (n=242) in postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who received no or only 1 line of prior ET for advanced disease. OS was a secondary end point; PFS was the primary end point.10,13

MONALEESA-7 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of KISQALI + ET (NSAI or tamoxifen) + goserelin (n=335) vs placebo + ET (NSAI or tamoxifen) + goserelin (n=337) (ITT) in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who received no prior ET for advanced disease. KISQALI is not indicated for concomitant use with tamoxifen. Efficacy results are from a prespecified subgroup analysis of 495 patients who received KISQALI (n=248) or placebo (n=247) with an NSAI + goserelin and were not powered to show statistical significance. OS was a secondary end point; PFS was the primary end point.10,14

1L=first line; 2L=second line; AI=aromatase inhibitor; EORTC QLQ-C30=European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30; ET=endocrine therapy; HR=hazard ratio; HRQOL=health-related quality of life; ITT=intent to treat; mBC=metastatic breast cancer; NSAI=nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; QOL=quality of life.

References: 1. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1738-1748;(protocol). doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1609709 2. Fasching PA, Beck JT, Chan A, et al. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer: health-related quality-of-life analyses from the MONALEESA-3 study. Breast. 2020;54:148-154. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.008 3. Harbeck N, Franke F, Villanueva-Vazquez R, et al. Health-related quality of life in premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy: results from a phase III randomized clinical trial (MONALEESA-7). Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020;12:1758835920943065. doi:10.1177/1758835920943065 4. Data on file. CLEE011A2301 additional analyses. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2017. 5. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(7):1541-1547. doi:10.1093/ annonc/mdy155 6. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(6):514-524. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1911149 7. Im S-A, Lu Y-S, Bardia A, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(4):307-316. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1903765 8. Im S-A, Lu Y-S, Bardia A, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(4):307-316;(protocol). doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1903765 9. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, et al, on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition). EORTC; 2001. 10. Kisqali. Prescribing information. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. 11. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(10):942-950. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2114663 12. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1738-1748. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1609709 13. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(24):2465-2472. doi:10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909 14. Tripathy D, Im S-A, Colleoni M, et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(7):904-915. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30292-4