With KISQALI, treatment is about more life for living
KISQALI is proven to help a broad range of patients with HR+/HER2- mBC live longer—and that means more time doing what they love.
NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use, or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.
KISQALI—the only CDK4/6 inhibitor to achieve statistically significant OS in a broad range of patients across 3 phase III trials2,3
1L refers to patients with mBC across all trials.
MONALEESA study information
MONALEESA-2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of KISQALI + letrozole (n=334) vs placebo + letrozole (n=334) in postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who received no prior therapy for advanced disease. OS was a secondary end point; PFS was the primary end point. At a median follow-up of 80 months, mOS was 63.9 months with KISQALI + letrozole (95% CI: 52.4-71.0) vs 51.4 months with placebo + letrozole (95% CI: 47.2-59.7); HR=0.765 (95% CI: 0.628-0.932); P=0.004.2,4,5
MONALEESA-3 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of KISQALI + fulvestrant (n=484) vs placebo + fulvestrant (n=242) in postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who received no or only 1 line of prior ET for advanced disease. OS was a secondary end point; PFS was the primary end point. In an exploratory analysis of a 1L subgroup of patients receiving KISQALI + fulvestrant (n=237) or placebo + fulvestrant (n=128), at a median follow-up of 71 months mOS was 67.6 months with KISQALI + fulvestrant (95% CI: 59.6-NR) vs 51.8 months with placebo + fulvestrant (95% CI: 40.4-61.2); HR=0.673 (95% CI: 0.504-0.899). At a median follow-up of 39 months, statistical significance was established for overall survival in the ITT population; HR=0.724 (95% CI: 0.568-0.924); P=0.00455. Results from the 71-month analysis were not prespecified and were observational in nature; as such, there was no prespecified statistical procedure controlling for type 1 error.2,6-8
MONALEESA-7 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of KISQALI + ET (NSAI or tamoxifen) + goserelin (n=335) vs placebo + ET (NSAI or tamoxifen) + goserelin (n=337) (ITT) in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who received no prior ET for advanced disease. KISQALI is not indicated for concomitant use with tamoxifen. Efficacy results are from a prespecified subgroup analysis of 495 patients who received KISQALI (n=248) or placebo (n=247) with an NSAI + goserelin and were not powered to show statistical significance. OS was a secondary end point; PFS was the primary end point. At a median follow-up of 54 months (exploratory analysis), mOS was 58.7 months with KISQALI + NSAI + goserelin (95% CI: 48.5-NR) vs 47.7 months with placebo + NSAI + goserelin (95% CI: 41.2-55.4); HR=0.798 (95% CI: 0.615-1.035). At a median follow-up of 35 months, statistical significance was established for overall survival in the ITT population; HR=0.71 (95% CI: 0.54-0.95); P=0.00973. Results from the 54-month analysis were not prespecified and were observational in nature; as such, there was no prespecified statistical procedure controlling for type 1 error.2,3,9-11
Take a closer look at the MONALEESA trials
An expert discusses proven overall survival across 3 phase III trials in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC
“The three studies…are compelling as a trio because they have a uniformly positive outcome, both for PFS and overall survival.” —Gabriel Hortobagyi, MD
Aggressive disease & visceral metastases
Explore outcomes from the RIGHT Choice trial and a pooled MONALEESA analysis for KISQALI + ET in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC who had aggressive disease and visceral metastases without visceral crisis